ACUTE PAIN
Effects of erector spinae plane block and quadratus lumborum block on postoperative opioid consumption in laparoscopic prostatectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Intensive Interdisciplinary Care, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
Submission date: 2025-02-15
Final revision date: 2025-09-04
Acceptance date: 2025-09-12
Publication date: 2025-10-04
Corresponding author
Tomasz Składzień
Department of Intensive Interdisciplinary Care, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2025;57(1):267-275
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and erector spinae (ESP) block are relatively new, regional analgesic techniques adapted to abdominal surgery to reduce opioid consumption in the postoperative period. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the ultrasound-guided bilateral ESP block and the bilateral QLB for patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP).
Methods:
Adult patients who underwent LRP were randomly allocated to one of two equal groups. Group I received an ultrasound-guided ESP block with 30 mL of 0.35% ropivacaine on both right and left sides. Group II received an ultrasound-guided QLB1 with 30 mL of 0.35% ropivacaine on both right and left sides.
Results:
There were 104 included patients, 52 patients in the ESP block group and 52 in the QLB group. There was no statistically significant difference in oxycodone consumption within the first 24 hours after surgery between the groups (P = 0.115, 95% CI, for ESP group 17.32–27.56, and for QLB group 22.04–31.07). Pain was evaluated using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery, with no significant differences between the groups (P = 0.325).
Conclusions:
Both bilateral QLB and ESP block provided effective postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing LRP. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups in terms of opioid consumption and pain scores during the first 24 hours. However, this trial was not designed or powered to establish equivalence or non-inferiority, and therefore such conclusions cannot be drawn.
REFERENCES (29)
1.
Ilic D, Neuberger MM, Djulbegovic M, Dahm P. Screening for prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2013: CD004720. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004720.pub3.
2.
Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, van der Kwast T, et al. European Association of Urology. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013. Eur Urol 2014; 65: 124-137. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.046.
3.
Lemoine A, Witdouck A, Beloeil H, Bonnet F; PROSPECT Working Group of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA). PROSPECT guidelines update for evidence-based pain management after prostatectomy for cancer. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2021; 40: 100922. DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2021.100922.
4.
Su S, Wang J, Lei Y, Yi T, Kang H, Bai B, Wang D. The efficacy of peritoneal flap fixation on symptomatic lymphocele formation following robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2024; 110: 1172-1182. DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000893.
5.
Britch SC, Walsh SL. Treatment of opioid overdose: current approaches and recent advances. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2022; 239: 2063-2081. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-022-06125-5.
6.
Sacerdote P, Bianchi M, Gaspani L, Manfredi B, Maucione A, Terno G, et al. The effects of tramadol and morphine on immune responses and pain after surgery in cancer patients. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 1411-1414. DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200006000-00028.
7.
Shahait M, Lee DI. Application of TAP block in laparoscopic urological surgery: current status and future directions. Curr Urol Rep 2019; 20: 20. DOI: 10.1007/s11934-019-0883-7.
8.
Taha T, Sionov BV, Rosenberg P, Stein A, Tsivian M, Sidi A, Tsivian A. Pain control after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: comparison between unilateral transversus abdominis plane block and wound infiltration. Urol Int 2019; 103: 19-24. DOI: 10.1159/000500744.
9.
Elsharkawy H, El-Boghdadly K, Barrington M. Quadratus lumborum block: anatomical concepts, mechanisms, and techniques. Anesthesiology 2019; 130: 322-335. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002524.
10.
Deng W, Long X, Li M, Li C, Guo L, Xu G, Yu S. Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain management after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98: e18448. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018448.
11.
Horosz B, Bialowolska K, Kociuba A, Dobruch J, Malec-Milewska M. Ultrasound-guided posterior quadratus lumborum block for postoperative pain control after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. EXCLI J 2022; 21: 335-343. DOI: 10.17179/excli2021-4615.
12.
Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The erector spinae plane block: a novel analgesic technique in thoracic neuropathic pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2016; 41: 621-627. DOI: 10.1097/AAP. 0000000000000451.
13.
Tulgar S, Selvi O, Senturk O, Serifsoy TE, Thomas DT. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block: indications, complications, and effects on acute and chronic pain based on a single-center experience. Cureus 2019; 11: e3815. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.3815.
14.
R Core Team (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at:
https://www.R-project.org/. .
15.
Ueshima H, Otake H, Lin JA. Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block: an updated review of anatomy and techniques. Biomed Res Int 2017; 2017: 2752876. DOI: 10.1155/2017/2752876.
16.
Ma N, Duncan JK, Scarfe AJ, Schuhmann S, Cameron AL. Clinical safety and effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in post-operative analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Anesth 2017; 31: 432-452. DOI: 10.1007/s00540-017-2323-5.
17.
Gao L, Xie K, Ding J, Jin G. Transversus abdominis plane block vs quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia in inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408: 411. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03149-z.
18.
Hu Z, Zhou Y, Zhao G, Zhang X, Liu C, Xing H, et al. Effects of quadratus lumborum block on perioperative multimodal analgesia and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. BMC Anesthesiol 2022; 22: 213. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-022-01755-w.
19.
Wang H, Deng W, Zhu X, Fei C. Perioperative analgesia with ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block for transurethral resection of prostate. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100: e28384. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028384.
20.
Jin Z, Liu J, Li R, Gan TJ, He Y, Lin J. Single injection quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia in adult surgical population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth 2020; 62: 109715. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109715.
21.
Buonanno P, Logrieco N, Marra A, Spirito L, Califano G, Blasio F, et al. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: comparison of subarachnoid analgesia, erector spine plane block, and intravenous analgesia for postoperative pain management. Korean J Anesthesiol 2023. DOI: 10.4097/kja.22821.
22.
Dost B, Kaya C, Ozdemir E, Ustun YB, Koksal E, Bilgin S, Bostancı Y. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing open radical prostatectomy: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Anesth 2021; 72: 110277. DOI: 10.1016/ j.jclinane.2021.110277.
23.
Aygun H, Kavrut Ozturk N, Pamukcu AS, Inal A, Kiziloglu I, Thomas DT, et al. Comparison of ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane Block and quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients: a prospective randomized study. J Clin Anesth 2020; 62: 109696. DOI: 10.1016/ j.jclinane.2019.109696.
24.
Baran O. Quadratus lumborum and erector spinae plane blocks are effective for analgesia in laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2023; 27: 11323-11333. DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202312_34571.
25.
Mahmoud Fakhry D, ElMoutaz Mahmoud H, Yehia Kassim D, NegmEldeen AbdElAzeem H. Erector spinae plane block versus quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer: a prospective randomized study. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2024; 2024: 6200915. DOI: 10.1155/2024/6200915.
26.
Qin Y, Zhou X, Wu M, She H, Wu J. Erector spinae plane block versus quadratus lumborum block for abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 2025; 49: 204-218. DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12428.
27.
Liheng L, Siyuan C, Zhen C, Changxue W. Erector spinae plane block versus transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Invest Surg 2022; 35: 1711-1722. DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2022.2098426.
28.
Hebbard PD. Transversalis fascia plane block, a novel ultrasound-guided abdominal wall nerve block. Can J Anaesth 2009; 56: 618-620. DOI: 10.1007/s12630-009-9110-1.
29.
Onay M, Erdoğan Kayhan G, Özen A, Şanal Baş S, Yelken B. Comparison of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block and erector spinae plane block in terms of their effects on postoperative pain in open nephrectomy. Minerva Anestesiol 2023; 89: 32-39. DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.22.16635-6.