ANAESTHESIOLOGY - GENERAL ANAESTHESIA / ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Figure from article: Ultrasound-assisted...
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Peripheral venous catheter (PVC) insertion is a common intervention, conventionally performed using visualization and palpation techniques. It has been reported that the first attempt success rate can be as low as 51%. Ultrasound guidance improves the overall success rate and the success rate of the first attempt. Therefore, we performed a randomized, prospective, clinical trial to compare two different techniques of PVC insertion in the setting of an operating theatre with a focus on the first attempt success rate.

Material and methods:
This clinical trial allocated patients scheduled for elective surgery in general anaesthesia to undergo PVC cannulation with ultrasound guidance (Group A) or to undergo PVC cannulation without the use of ultrasound (Group B).

Results:
A total of 613 adult patients were enrolled. The success of the first cannulation attempt was significantly higher in Group A compared to Group B (Group A: 90.6%, Group B: 84.5%, P = 0.039). The overall success rate in both groups was 100%. The time needed to perform PVC cannulation was significantly lower in Group B than Group A (Group A: 406 ± 200 s, Group B: 301 ± 215 s, P < 0.001).

Conclusions:
We found that ultrasound-guided PVC cannulation was associated with a higher first-attempt success rate than the conventional technique.
REFERENCES (17)
1.
Skulec R, Callerova J, Vojtisek P, Cerny V. Two different techniques of ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheter placement versus the traditional approach in the pre-hospital emergency setting: a randomized study. Intern Emerg Med 2020; 15: 303-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739....
 
2.
van Loon FHJ, Buise MP, Claassen JJF, Dierick-van Daele ATM, Bouw­man ARA. Comparison of ultrasound guidance with palpation and direct visualisation for peripheral vein cannulation in adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2018; 121: 358-366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.....
 
3.
Prottengeier J, Albermann M, Heinrich S, Birkholz T, Gall C, Schmidt J. The prehospital intravenous access assessment: a prospective study on intravenous access failure and access delay in prehospital emergency medicine. Eur J Emerg Med 2016; 23: 442-447. DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000291.
 
4.
Bridey C, Thilly N, Lefevre T, Maire-Richard A, Morel M, Levy B, et al. Ultrasound-guided versus landmark approach for peripheral intravenous access by critical care nurses: a randomised controlled study. BMJ Open 2018; 8: 20220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjope....
 
5.
Pittiruti M, Van Boxtel T, Scoppettuolo G, Carr P, Konstantinou E, Ortiz Miluy G, et al. European recommendations on the proper indication and use of peripheral venous access devices (the ERPIUP consensus): a WoCoVA project. J Vasc Access 2021; 24: 165-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/112972....
 
6.
van Loon FHJ, van Hooff LWE, de Boer HD, Koopman SSHA, Buise MP, Korsten HHM, et al. The modified A-DIVA scale as a predictive tool for prospective identification of adult patients at risk of a difficult intravenous access: a multicenter validation study. J Clin Med 2019; 8: 144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm802....
 
7.
Tada M, Yamada N, Matsumoto T, Takeda C, Furukawa TA, Watanabe N. Ultrasound guidance versus landmark method for peripheral venous cannulation in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 12: CD013434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/146518....
 
8.
Gottlieb M, Sundaram T, Holladay D, Nakitende D. Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous line placement: A narrative review of evidence-based best practices. West J Emerg Med 2017; 18: 1047-1054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5811/westje....
 
9.
Mbamalu D, Banerjee A. Methods of obtaining peripheral venous access in difficult situations. Postgrad Med J 1999; 75: 459-462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.7....
 
10.
Cantor-Peled G, Ovadia-Blechman MHZ. Peripheral vein locating techniques. Imaging Med 2016; 8: 83-88.
 
11.
Jenssen C, Brkljacic B, Hocke M, Ignee A, Piscaglia F, Radzina M, et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part VI – Ultrasound-guided vascular interventions. Ultraschall Med 2016; 37: 473-476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035....
 
12.
McCarthy ML, Shokoohi H, Boniface KS, Eggelton R, Lowey A, Lim K, et al. Ultrasonography versus landmark for peripheral intravenous cannulation: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med 2016; 68: 10-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anne....
 
13.
Ismailoğlu EG, Zaybak A, Akarca FK, Kiyan S. The effect of the use of ultrasound in the success of peripheral venous catheterisation. Int Emerg Nurs 2015; 23: 89-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IENJ. 2014.07.010.
 
14.
Aponte H, Acosta S, Rigamonti D, Sylvia B, Austin P, Samolitis T. The use of ultrasound for placement of intravenous catheters. AANA J 2007; 75: 212-216.
 
15.
Pappas NL, Michaud TE, Wolbers RM, Steward JC, Fevurly TA, Samolitis TJ, et al. Ultrasound guidance as a rescue technique for peripheral intravenous cannulation [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2024 Feb 4]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/p....
 
16.
Benkhadra M, Collignon M, Fournel I, Oeuvrard C, Rollin P, Perrin M, et al. Ultrasound guidance allows faster peripheral IV cannulation in children under 3-years of age with difficult venous access: a prospective randomized study. Pediatr Anesth 2012; 22: 449-454. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.or.... 03830.x.
 
17.
Scott J, Seth S, Liberty C, Christopher W, Jamie H, Chad R, et al. Ultrasound-guided peripheral IV placement. N Engl J Med 2024; 366: e38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMvc....
 
eISSN:1731-2531
ISSN:1642-5758
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top