ANAESTHESIOLOGY - GENERAL ANAESTHESIA / ORIGINAL ARTICLE
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Sedative premedication may hold notable significance in pediatric patients undergoing diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterization, as it minimizes anxiety, facilitates parental separation, and allows for the acceptance of inhalational induction. The intranasal route is a reliable method for administering sedatives as pre- medication in pediatric patients. This study compared and evaluated the sedative effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus intranasal midazolam as premedication in pediatric patients undergoing transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defects.

Material and methods:
This prospective, randomized, double-blind study included 40 pediatric patients aged 3 to 6 years scheduled for transcatheter perimembranous VSD closure under general anesthesia. The subjects were randomly assigned to receive either intranasal midazolam at 0.2 mg kg–1 body mass or intranasal dexmedetomidine at 0.5 μg kg–1 body mass. The primary outcome measured was the effect of preoperative sedatives on the Ramsay sedation score. Secondary outcomes included the child-parent separation score, child emergence agitation level, effects on hemodynamics, and oxygen saturation.

Results:
This study included 40 individuals with similar demographic profiles and comparable duration of the procedure (P = 0.152) in both groups. No statistically significant differences were detected in the Ramsay sedation score (P = 0.582), child-parent separation score (P = 1.000) 20 minutes after drug administration, or postoperative child emergence agitation level (P = 0.351). No statistically significant difference was observed in terms of blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation between the two groups.

Conclusions:
Pediatric patients were successfully and effectively sedated with both intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal midazolam, with stable hemodynamics and oxygen saturation.
REFERENCES (24)
1.
Mostafa M, Morsy K. Premedication with intranasal dexmedetomidine, midazolam and ketamine for children undergoing bone marrow biopsy and aspirate. Egypt J Anaesth 2013; 29: 131-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egja....
 
2.
Kidd L, Discroll DJ, Gersony WH, Hayes CJ, Keane JF, O’Fallon WM, et al. Second natural history study of congenital heart defects: results of treatment of patients with ventricular septal defects. Circulation 1993; 87 (2 Suppl): l138-l151.
 
3.
Hijazi ZM, Hakim F, Haweleh AA, Madani A, Tarawna W, Hiari A, Cao QL. Catheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects using the new Amplatzer membranous VSD occluder: initial clinical experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002; 56: 508-515. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.10292.
 
4.
Bailey AM, Baum RA, Horn K, Lewis T, Morizio K, Schultz A, et al. Review of intranasally administered medications for use in the emergency department. J Emerg Med 2017; 53: 38-48. DOI: 10.1016/ j.jemermed.2017.01.020.
 
5.
Satervas Y, Gonzalez M, Duran C. Manual de Analgesia y Sedación en Urgencias de Pediatría. Available at: https://seup.org/pdf_public/gt... (Accessed: 20.08.2021).
 
6.
Tsze DS, Ieni M, Fenster DB, Babineau J, Kriger J, Levin B, Dayan PS. Optimal volume of administration of intranasal midazolam in children: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Emerg Med 2017; 69: 600-609. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.08.450.
 
7.
Yuen VM, Hui TW, Irwin MG, Yao TJ, Wong GL, Yuen MK. Optimal timing for the administration of intranasal dexmedetomidine for premedication in children. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 922-929. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06453.x.
 
8.
Yuen VM, Hui TW, Irwin MG, Yuen MK. A comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam for premedication in pediatric anesthesia: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2008; 106: 1715-1721. DOI: 10.1213/ane. 0b013e31816c8929.
 
9.
Davis PJ, Tome JA, McGowan FX, Cohen IT, Latta K, Felder H. Preanesthetic medication with intranasal midazolam for brief pediatric surgical procedures. Effect on recovery and hospital discharge times. Anesthesiology 1995; 82: 2-5. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199501000-00002.
 
10.
Sessler CN, Grap MG, Ramsy MA. Evaluating and monitoring analgesia and sedation in the intensive care unit. Crit Care 2008; 12 (Suppl 3): S2. DOI: 10.1186/cc6148.
 
11.
Feld LH, Champeau MW, van Steennis CA, Scott JC. Preanesthetic medication in children: a comparison of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate versus placebo. Anesthesiology 1989; 71: 374-377.
 
12.
Almenrader N, Passariello M, Coccetti B, Haiberger R, Pietropaoli P. Premedication in children: a comparison of oral midazolam and oral clonidine. Paediatr Anaesth 2007; 17: 1143-1149. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2007.02332.x.
 
13.
Wang J, Bu G. Influence of intranasal medication on the structure of the nasal mucosa. Chin Med J (Engl) 2002; 115: 617-619.
 
14.
Saad BB, Tharwat AI, Ghobrial HN, Elfawal SM. Intranasal dexmedetomidine versus intranasal midazolam as pre-anesthetic medication in pediatric age group undergoing adenotonsillectomy. Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology 2020; 12: 1-0.
 
15.
Messeha MM, El-Morsy GZ. Comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine compared to midazolam as a premedication in pediatrics with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac catheterization. Anesth Essays Res 2018; 12: 170-175. DOI: 10.4103/aer.AER_119_17.
 
16.
Han G, Yu WW, Zhao P. A randomized study of intranasal vs. Intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine in gastroscopy. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2014; 52: 756-761. DOI: 10.5414/CP202099.
 
17.
Cimen ZS, Hanci A, Sivrikaya GU, Kilinc LT, Erol MK. Comparison of buccal and nasal dexmedetomidine premedication for pediatric patients. Pediatr Anesth 2013; 23: 134-138.
 
18.
Mellion SA, Bourne D, Brou L, Brent A, Adelgais K, Galinkin J, Wathen J. Evaluating clinical effectiveness and pharmacokinetic profile of atomized intranasal midazolam in children undergoing laceration repair. J Emerg Med 2017; 53: 397-404. DOI: 10.1016/ j.jemermed.2017.05.029.
 
19.
Neville DNW, Hayes KR, Ivan Y, McDowell ER, Pitetti RD. Double-blind randomized controlled trial of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus intranasal midazolam as anxiolysis prior to pediatric laceration repair in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2016; 23: 910-917. DOI: 10.1111/acem.12998.
 
20.
Sheta SA, Al-Sarheed MA, Abdelhalim AA. Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Paediatr Anaesth 2014; 24: 181-189. DOI: 10.1111/pan.12287.
 
21.
Hsu YW, Cortinez LI, Robertson KM, Keifer JC, Sum-Ping ST, Moretti EW, et al. Dexmedetomidine pharmacodynamics: Part I: Crossover comparison of the respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology 2004; 101: 1066-1076. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200411000-00005.
 
22.
Akin A, Bayram A, Esmaoglu A, Tosun Z, Aksu R, Altuntas R, Boyaci A. Dexmedetomidine vs. midazolam for premedication of pediatric patients undergoing anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth 2012; 22: 871-876.
 
23.
Bergese SD, Patrick Bender S, McSweeney TD, Fernandez S, Dzwonczyk R, Sage K. A comparative study of dexmedetomidine with midazolam and midazolam alone for sedation during elective awake fiberoptic intubation. J Clin Anesth 2010; 22: 35-40. DOI: 10.1016/ j.jclinane.2009.02.016.
 
24.
Mizrak A, Koruk S, Ganidagli S, Bulut M, Oner U. Premedication with dexmedetomidine and midazolam attenuates agitation after electroconvulsive therapy. J Anesth 2009; 23: 6-10. DOI: 10.1007/s00540-008-0695-2.
 
eISSN:1731-2531
ISSN:1642-5758
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top